![]() ![]() ![]() The people who call themselves anarchists today wink at each other, understanding “anarchist” as a convenient cloak to hide under and a hammer with which to wreck the hated system (which at least works) on the road to a socialist uberstate (which won’t). After using them as cannon fodder, the socialists pulled a cynical bait-and-switch. I don’t agree with, but do feel an empathy for, those bitter old anarchists. Her honest, old-fashioned leftism viewed a practical anarchism as an end goal achievable and worth striving for. I am not a scholar of Le Guin’s work, but from reading her and about her one can glean that she was a feminist and an anarchist. When the Walk Away movement began, Le Guin’s story resonated loudly in my head. Sooner or later the troubled ones simply walk away from Omelas, turning their backs on all they know. A few, though, are troubled enough by this situation that they cannot. Most citizens of Omelas have accepted the bargain, barely thinking about the shackled child below the streets. Le Guin was obviously setting up the moral quandary which is the spine of the story. It isn’t explained why, but the existence of Omelas is dependent on the continuous torture of this child. However, beneath the city a child is imprisoned in horrible conditions. Everyone has enough to eat and places to sleep without having to toil for it, a true paradise. Omelas is a utopian place, whose citizens spend their days and nights seeking pleasure, recreating, or working, if they choose. Le Guin titled “ The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas.” Le Guin got the name for the fictional city of Omelas from a fleeting glance in her rear-view mirror at a road sign as she drove away from Salem, Oregon. There is a 1973 science fiction or fantasy story, depending upon how you define those terms, by Ursula K. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |